“Traditional woman” is a codeword for “Domestic breeding slave” in dating these days

I saw this and all I can say is bless all you single women out there having to deal with this:

TEXT:

I just read your bio. I’m sorry I don’t think we’d be a good match.
Today 12:46 PM

Out of curiosity, which part made you determine that?
Today 2:50 PM

Single mother. So I’ll come second to children that aren’t even mine. Which is totally understandable btw. Also you have kids and you’re 35 so you probably don’t want anymore and even if you did it’s about a 70% chance that you can’t. You’re also an “independent” woman. So you’re [sic] career will come before me as well. Most likely not submissive. Have the same “I don’t need a man I want a man” mentality as all the other girls that let that social construct brainwash them. When girls typically say they are independent they use it as an excuse for their bad behavior and masculine traits. I want a stay at home wife that’s the mother to my children who will give me stability and will stay loyal to me and is submissive. But that’s impossible to find. Sorry for the rant, modern dating is impossible for men like me lol

WHERE DO I BEGIN?

Let’s just break down each sentence.

Single mother. So I’ll come second to children that aren’t even mine. Which is totally understandable btw.

Wow. Single mothers are now ostracized for having children, and putting them above and beyond other relationships in their life. The parent-child relationship is and always will be special. There is no chance in hell, that I could ever leave or ‘divorce’ Little Bun. He is bonded to me for life, and that is the way it should be.

To then not want to date a single mother for this reason, that her kids would come above him that aren’t his, is ridiculous. Children are children. Whether they are yours by blood or not, it is a crapshoot or a beautiful thing. Step-parents and step-children can have the strongest heart bonds in the world, while parents with their children may have no contact or communication at all.

Then, if she did have children with him (oh the unspeakable), he would be okay if they came before him in terms of priority and hierachy? I DO NOT THINK SO. Red flag.

Also you have kids and you’re 35 so you probably don’t want anymore and even if you did it’s about a 70% chance that you can’t.

OK this first sentence I will give to him, only because at my age, I too, do not want any more children. This is understandable that you do not want to have or start a relationship with someone who doesn’t want children and you desperately do.

But did he have to write the second, utterly rude and uncalled for half of “70% chance you can’t”? I mean. Women are having children into their 40s now, and to throw that out there like he’s evaluating property or a cow he just bought to see if it can give milk and birth calves, is beyond despicable.

You’re also an “independent” woman. So you’re [sic] career will come before me as well.

And why would you think that it has to be one or the other? I have a career and a partner. I have never thought once in my life that my career would come before my partner. It is a shared responsibility and mutual respect that happens between us, that he knows my career is important, and sometimes his stuff has to take a back seat. The same way that when he has something important (a meeting, an exam, interview), my stuff for that day, takes a back seat.

Most likely not submissive. Have the same “I don’t need a man I want a man” mentality as all the other girls that let that social construct brainwash them.

This is a bad thing? Social construct? No no. What you are referring to is that the tables are slowly but surely turning and women do not NEED A MAN in the sense that in the past, women were not allowed to be independent without a male guardian of some sort. Women were considered inferior, second class citizens (of course then there was also a rank by caste related to money and the colour of your skin).

Women HAD to have a MALE someone or another – father, brother, cousin, uncle, even their OWN SON to manage their affairs and ‘take care of them’. They could not have any bank accounts, credit cards, couldn’t access lines of credit, start a business… all of this is fact.

Women for all intents and purposes were considered property, and a burdensome one at that.

Here are some facts:

Before 1974, women were not allowed to apply for credit.

Before 1977, women couldn’t take action against sexual harassment in the workplace.

So this means that in the past, women “needing men”, was just a veil for women needing men .. to simply exist. Without a man, they could not do anything. What this guy is asking for, is a woman to need a man in the way a slave depends on a master, to control the money, to control their independence and life.

Also – “submissive”? What, that she says nothing about anything? Lets you hit her? Lets you cheat on her and turns a blind eye? Who the hell willingly wants this kind of relationship? Get a sex doll.

When girls typically say they are independent they use it as an excuse for their bad behavior and masculine traits.

And of course by ‘bad behaviour’, he means drinking alcohol, wearing clothing that is “inappropriate”, and by masculine traits, he means being independent, sure of yourself, confident, able to make your own money, and basically.. his equal. He doesn’t want an equal. He wants property.

I want a stay at home wife that’s the mother to my children who will give me stability and will stay loyal to me and is submissive. But that’s impossible to find.

“Who will give me stability”…. “will stay loyal to me”… and “submissive”… are all codewords for – domestic slave and someone I can use for anything I want. This is the kind of relationship you want? A slave to control?

She would of course, be expected to do everything. Cook, clean, childcare, provide sex, be dependent on him, his money, and means, be quiet and not ’cause trouble’ no matter what he does or says, and work 24/7.

THANK GOODNESS THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND. FINALLY. I am so happy women have their own means, are independent and do not need men. (Women should always have a Plan B and their own money, by the way)

I pity any woman who ends up with this person.

Sorry for the rant, modern dating is impossible for men like me lol

Get a sex doll. You don’t want to date. Dating these days, implies equality and mutual respect. You have none for women. You want a slave and you want a second-class citizen to feel superior to.

And ask yourself WHY modern dating is impossible for you — IT IS YOU. IT IS ALL YOU. The common factor is YOU BEING A PIECE OF CRAP.

If this is the kind of crap that is coming out on the dating scene, I am definitely staying single with my independence and never ever getting into another relationship again. It’s exhausting and I applaud all single women out there for having to field this crap.