How to answer a rather random business case interview question
I was chatting with Jessica the other day and she mentioned how she was blindsided with a really strange interview question that went like this:
How many golf balls are sold in Canada?
Sounds TOTALLY random right?
Well it’s not.
It’s actually something that gung-ho business school-type interviewers use to screen candidates to test for logic, basic math skills and how fast you can think on the fly.
The way to answer it (as I was taught in school) is to keep these things in mind:
- Keep the math simple
- Use the (few) facts you have on hand
- Talk out loud as you are reasoning through the problem
KEEP THE MATH SIMPLE
Use 10s or 100s. Don’t try and get fancy with 75 or any odd numbers that are hard to multiply, add or subtract. You need to keep this simple so that you don’t need a calculator under such pressure.
USE THE ACTUAL FACTS YOU HAVE ON HAND
You don’t need many, just one is enough.
For example, you know there are:
- 10 provinces in Canada
- 3 territories
We can safely assume that no one golfs in the Territories, so just concentrate on the provinces as your number.
TALK OUT LOUD AS YOU ARE REASONING THROUGH THE PROBLEM
Talk as you are writing down the calculations.
In the above example, you already know that there are 10 provinces in Canada, so now you can make up a few facts or logical assumptions.
Something like this:
- There are golf courses in Canada (guess at this number, say 10 or something because there is on average ONE in each province)
- There are people who golf abroad who also buy golf balls, let’s say 10,000 in each province on average.
Then you make up some guesstimate numbers:
GOLF COURSES THAT BUY GOLF BALLS:
10 golf courses could buy 500,000 golf balls each year on average
500,000 x 10 = 5,000,000 golf balls
PEOPLE WHO GOLF AND BUY GOLF BALLS:
10,000 people x 10 provinces = 100,000 people in total
100,000 people x 100 golf balls a year = 10,000,000 golf balls
TOTAL GOLF BALLS SOLD IN CANADA
Now add the two numbers together:
5,000,000 + 10,000,000 = 15,000,000 golf balls sold in Canada each year
And done.
That’s how you solve a case study interview question.
19 Comments
-
-
Kassandra
In my early twenties I had interviewed for a position and had a question similar to this along with a full on math, psych and french test. It was worse than school! But, they needed to narrow down the field of applicants from thousands to just the twenty that they selected to hire. I ended up being one of the twenty people they hired. As you said, keep it simple in terms of figures and communicate the rationale of how you came up with your response. It gives the interviewer a lot of insight on the person being interviewed.
-
Stefanie @ The Broke and Beautiful Life
I don’t like these kinds of questions, particularly in a stressful situation like a job interview.
-
Lila
@Stefanie @ The Broke and Beautiful Life: Totally agree with you. Maybe for those not in consulting, we should treat these type of questions as a lark and stay relaxed as we attempt to answer them.
-
-
tomatoketchup
How about just saying “I don’t know”?
-
AdinaJ
I know this wasn’t the point, but … One course per province? Lol! There are, like, 15 just in and around Edmonton. I don’t know about the rest of the country, but there be some golf-mad people around here.
Anyway, that’s a great answer. You’re interview-ready :)2/
-
NZ Muse
Not really something I gotta worry about, but advice I always read is to focus on your reasoning and communicate your thinking – the actual answer isn’t necessarily important.
Also – one golf course per province? That’s not rooted in reality is it? That’s just a nice easy number you picked as an example?
-
Liquid
I like the way you thought out the solution. I wouldn’t have thought about the number of balls purchased by golf courses. You must be pretty smart if you can keep track of all that math in your head, lol. One time when I was being interviewed I was asked what vegetable would I be if I had to choose one. I answered mushroom.
Lila
I feel questions like these are silly, pompous and pointless. Although you did a great job in explaining on how to solve it. 😀
I would do my research on the company on glassdoor and probably avoid a company that asks these questions.
These questions seem to be more normally common with IT fields and for someone who is interested in climbing the corporate ladder like a business executive.
Google used to ask brainteasers and they learned and admitted recently that these weirdo questions have nothing to do with hiring the right person.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2420764,00.asp
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/business/in-head-hunting-big-data-may-not-be-such-a-big-deal.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
“On the hiring side, we found that brainteasers are a complete waste of time,” Laszlo Bock, senior vice president of people operations at Google, told The New York Times. “How many golf balls can you fit into an airplane? How many gas stations in Manhattan? A complete waste of time. They don’t predict anything. They serve primarily to make the interviewer feel smart.”
So if Google is no longer asking knockouts like “how many vacuums are made every year in the USA?” then what type of questions is it asking? According to Bock, the Web giant is relying on more behavior-based queries, like “Give me an example of a time when you solved an analytically difficult problem.”
“When you ask somebody to speak to their own experience, and you drill into that, you get two kinds of information,” he explained. “One is you get to see how they actually interacted in a real-world situation, and the valuable ‘meta’ information you get about the candidate is a sense of what they consider to be difficult.”
Meanwhile, Google also no longer asks all potential employees for a transcript, GPAs, and test scores — unless you’re just a few years out of school. The Web giant found that this information — like brainteasers — doesn’t serve as a predictor of who will prove to be a good employee.
“One of the things we’ve seen from all our data crunching is that G.P.A.’s are worthless as a criteria for hiring, and test scores are worthless — no correlation at all except for brand-new college grads, where there’s a slight correlation,” Bock said.